Munich's Complex Heroes and Villains
Movies like to provide us with noble heroes to root for and nasty
villains to hate. Films based on actual history are no different.
But real people tend to be a tad more complex than your typical
movie villain or hero. So historical films often fudge the facts
a bit. The "heroes" become better than they actually were,
and the "baddies" much worse.
But Steven Spielberg's new film Munich refuses to go that
route. The film details the actions of a covert Israeli assassination
squad as it targeted organizers of Black September, the terrorist
group responsible for the kidnapping (and subsequent massacre) of
eleven Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games.
Munich's Israelis are flawed "heroes." While often
admirable, they bumble occasionally, and lose their moral compass
at times. They also agonize over whether their actions are simply
feeding into an endless cycle of Arab/Israeli violence, since Palestinian
terrorism increased in response to their assassinations.
And the film takes the time to humanize the Palestinians, as well.
We see them at home with their families, reading poetry, espousing
dreams of a homeland.
So when they are killed, we feel as uneasy as do the "heroes."
Some critics have given Spielberg flak for this approach. But in
the end, it makes for a more powerful film. And one whose history
is more complex, and more relevant.
Q. Were Avner and his assassination squad real people?
A. The film is based on George Jonas's book, Vengeance, which
chronicles the experiences of the Israeli hit squad, and most particularly
its leader, Avner. Jonas claimed that "Avner" (reported
to be Israeli security expert Yuval Aviv) was his key source for
Palestinians as well as Israelis have challenged some details of
Jonas's account, and Spielberg's film. But we'll probably never
know what "really" happened. In the secretive world of
terror and counter-terror, where governments and terrorists disseminate
the truth for their own purposes, it's hard to find the truth.
Q. The film shows the young daughter of a target causing momentary
panic among the strike team when she almost sets off a hidden bomb.
Was that real?
A. No, the little girl never came near the telephone bomb. It blew
up the Palestinian target as planned. But that story, and the other
exaggerated close calls in the film illustrate a key aspect of the
assassination squads-their admirable efforts to kill only their
intended targets, avoiding innocent bystanders. They most often
But "clean" assassinations weren't the only Israeli response
to Munich. As the film mentions, Israel also bombed PLO camps, killing
at least two hundred, many of them women and children.
Q. The film shows Avner's men and a PLO team sharing the same
"safe house" at one point. Did that happen?
A. Improbable as it sounds, it did happen. The real Avner and his
men passed themselves off as European radicals, and the Palestinians
apparently didn't suspect their actual identity.
But the conversation that takes place there between Avner and a
Palestinian--in which the latter passionately voices the Palestinian
point of view--was entirely fictional. Spielberg, though, sees it
as a highlight of his film. Without that exchange, he said in a
recent interview in Time magazine, "I would have been making
a Charles Bronson movie--good guys vs. bad guys and Jews killing
Arabs without any context. And I was never going to make that picture."
Q. Did the operation take as long as shown in the film?
A. Longer, at least for Avner's group, who spent two and a half
years on the mission, a much longer stretch than implied in the
Q. Did Avner actually get information from a mysterious Frenchman
A. Yes. "Le Group" was Avner's chief source of information
on the whereabouts of their Palestinian targets. This shadowy group,
run by Louis's father, gathered information on spies, terrorists,
and radical organizers throughout Europe, and sold it to any clandestine
group with enough cash.
But though the real Avner liked both Louis and his "Papa,"
he could never wholly trust them. And when his own men began getting
killed, he certainly suspected "Le Group" of selling them
Q. Was there really an Israeli bureaucrat who demanded "receipts"?
A. The line gets a chuckle, but the story is straight from Vengeance.
Yet the book also notes a curious irony. Secret agents had to submit
receipts for every personal expense, even a one-dollar cup of coffee.
Yet they were trusted, no questions asked, with hundreds of thousands
of dollars in cash, which was used to pay off informants or arms
dealers. Neither of those groups, of course, were willing to offer
Q. Were those assassinated the actual planners of Munich?
A. That's disputed. Some may have been key planners, but others
may just have been minor Palestinian activists.
To its credit, the film shows Avner and his men struggling with
this issue, raising questions over the evidence supporting their
targets' ties to Black September. The answers they get are ambiguous.
Like the film itself. It doesn't provide easy answers, or clear
heroes and villains. But it does make us think. And that's the best
thing an historical film can do.
Q. Where to find more background information?
A. George Jonas's Vengeance is a good read.
This column ran in the Dayton Daily News on 1/6/06,
and the Daily Southtown on 1/4/06.